Reliability and Construct Validity of the Short Form 36 Questionnaire for Conjunctival Tumor Patients in Indonesia

Senyum Indrakila, Widyanti Soewoto, Joko Purnomo, Erma Malindha, Reza Pahlevi Prastawa

Abstract


Background: The Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire was used to measure quality of life (QoL) in Indonesia for patients with various conditions. However, its validity and reliability, specifically for patients with conjunctival tumors, remain understudied. Given the limited research on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in this patient population, our research aims to fill this gap by validating the SF-36 specifically for conjunctival tumor patients.

Method: This observational, cross-sectional study recruited patients with conjunctival tumors receiving treatment at the Department of Ophthalmology, Dr Moewardi Hospital, between May and July 2024, using consecutive sampling. Participants completed the SF-36 questionnaire in the Indonesian context. Validity was assessed through bivariate correlation analysis, examining the Pearson correlation value for each item's questionnaire with the total QoL score. Reliability was determined using scale reliability analysis, focusing on Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The data was processed using IBM SPSS version 26.

Results: The Pearson correlation coefficients for the 36-item scores range from 0.345 to 0.797, indicating a moderate to significant correlation. The scale-level Cronbach's alpha for the comprehensive tool is 0.942, suggesting excellent internal consistency. The SF-36 demonstrated robust reliability across its eight domains, confirming its suitability for measuring QoL in this demographic. These findings confirm that the SF-36 questionnaire in the Indonesian context is highly reliable and has construct validity in conjunctival tumor patients.

Conclusion: The SF-36 questionnaire in the Indonesian context exhibits a satisfactory reliability scale and construct validity in assessing the QoL of conjunctival tumor patients. Further research with a larger participant pool is recommended.


Keywords


quality of life, questionnaire, reliability and validity, tumors

Full Text: View | Download

DOI: 10.33371/ijoc.v19i3.1320

Article Metrics

Abstract View: 104,
PDF Download: 52
             

References


Shields C, Shields J. Tumors of the conjunctiva and cornea. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019;67(12):1930–1948.

Alkatan HM, Alshomar KM, Helmi HA, et al. Conjunctival lesions: A 5-year basic demographic data and clinicopathological review in a tertiary eye care hospital. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2022;12(1):25–39.

Desjardins L. Specificities of ophthalmic tumors: Usefulness of a national network. Oncologie. 2021;22(4):189–194.

Furdova A, Czanner G, Koller J, et al. Amniotic membrane application in surgical treatment of conjunctival tumors. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):1–8.

Murgoci N. Quality of life outcomes evaluation after motor rehabilitation of the lower limbs using a stationary bicycle. Balneo PRM Res J. 2023;14(1):1–17.

Koudeláková L, Kohanová D, Bartoníčková D, et al. Perceived health-related quality of life and selected characteristics of inpatients with rheumatic diseases. Cent Eur J Nurs Midwifery. 2024;15(2):1090–1099.

Othman ER, Abdelmagied AM, Khashbah MY, et al. Diagnostic delay and health-related quality of life in Egyptian women with endometriosis. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2024;29(1):1–9.

Ohlsson-Nevo E, Hiyoshi A, Norén P, et al. The Swedish RAND-36: Psychometric characteristics and reference data from the Mid-Swed health survey. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021;5(1):1–11.

Salim S, Yamin M, Alwi I, Setiati S. Validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of SF-36 quality of life questionnaire on patients with permanent pacemakers. Acta Med Indones. 2017;49(1):10–16.

Esa DF, Shatri H, Rumende CM, et al. Validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the 9-item Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire ( IBDQ-9 ). Med J Indones. 2023;32(3):168–172.

Ramadhanty Z, Yarsa KY, Probandari A. Construct validity and reliability of Indonesian version of RAND SF-36 quality of life questionnaire in breast cancer patients. Indonesian Journal of Cancer. 2019;13(2):55–58.

Tanti I, Wira VVW, Pragustine Y, et al. Validation of the Indonesian version of the graded chronic pain scale 2.0 in pain-related temporomandibular disorders. Med J Indones. 2020;29(1):42–46.

Arovah NI, Heesch KC. Verification of the reliability and validity of the short form 36 scale in Indonesian middle-aged and older adults. J Prev Med Public Health. 2020;53(3):180–188.

Gómez-Melero S, Caballero-Villarraso J, Escribano BM, et al. Impact of cognitive impairment on quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients—a comprehensive review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(11):1–17.

Mills S, Tuffrey C, Tbaily L, Tighe M. Modification of the Paediatric Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom and Quality of Life Questionnaire (PGSQ) for children with cerebral palsy: A preliminary study. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024;8(1):1–6.

Veldhorst C, Luijmes A, Kef S, et al. Scoping review: Quality of life of siblings of children who are deaf and hard of hearing, have a vision or motor impairment. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023;4(11):1–14.

Qan’ir Y, Guan T, Idiagbonya E, et al. Quality of life among patients with cancer and their family caregivers in the Sub-Saharan Region: A systematic review of quantitative studies. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022;2(3):1–20.

Özcan H, Burger NB, Dulmen-den Broeder EV, et al. Instruments to identify menstrual complaints and their impact on adolescents: A systematic review. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2024;37(2):106–120.

Benton MJ, Hutchins AM. The relationship between resting metabolic rate and quality of life is moderated by age and body composition in women: A cross-sectional study. BMC Women’s Health. 2024;24(1):1–9.

Abdullah M, Maulahela H, Utari AP, et al. Patient assessment of constipation quality of life questionnaire: Validity and reliability for Indonesian population. Med J Indones. 2019;28(4):345–350.

Andersen JR, Breivik K, Engelund IE, et al. Correlated physical and mental health composite scores for the RAND-36 and RAND-12 health surveys: Can we keep them simple? Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022;20(1):1–8.

Hoffman KE, Penson DF, Zhao Z, et al. Patient-reported outcomes through 5 years for active surveillance, surgery, brachytherapy, or external beam radiation with or without androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2020;323(2):149–163.

Manoharan A, Harris MM, Chin BH, et al. Correction to: Translation and validation of Menopause Quick 6 (MQ6) into the Malay language. BMC Prim Care. 2024;25(1):1–6.

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17–48.

Zhang S, Sun K, Zheng R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2015. J Natl Cancer Cent. 2021;1(1):2–11.

Flor-Alemany M, Sandborg J, Migueles JH, et al. Mediterranean diet adherence and health-related quality of life during pregnancy: Is the mediterranean diet beneficial in non-mediterranean countries? Nutrients. 2024;16(5):1–11.

Repo A, Eskelinen M, Saimanen I, et al. Patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) RAND-36-item health survey for gallstone disease patients five years following surgery: A prospective randomized study. In Vivo. 2024;38(3):1213–1219.

Manju L, Joseph J, Beevi N. Validation of kidney disease quality of life short form 36 (KDQOL-SFTM) in malayalam among patients undergoing haemodialysis in South Kerala. Indian J Nephrol. 2020;30(5):316–320.

Idu CJ, Haryani H, Noviana U. Factors related to physical activity behavior among breast cancer patients in Dr. Sardjito General Hospital Yogyakarta. Indonesian Journal of Cancer. 2023;17(3):191–197.

Lins-Kusterer L, Aguiar I, Santos-Lins LS, et al. Validation of the RAND 36-item health survey questionnaire in Brazil. Arq Gastroenterol. 2022;59(2):193–197.

Schulz CB, Rainsbury P, Hoffman JJ, et al. The watery eye quality of life (WEQOL) questionnaire: A patient-reported outcome measure for surgically amenable epiphora. Eye (Basingstoke). 2022;36(7):1468–1475.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.